Legal Opinion
United States v. King
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided May 11, 2005No. 6:03-1092-HMHPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HERLONG, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the United States of America’s motion for a preliminary order of forfeiture as to Kenneth Gordy (“Gordy”). Gordy has not responded to the motion. After a review of the pertinent law, the court denies the government’s motion for a preliminary order of forfeiture.
I. Statement of the Facts
On October 20, 2004, pursuant to a plea agreement, Gordy pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distribution of 5 kilograms or more of cocaine and 50 grams or more of cocaine base, possession with intent to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Robert PetrieCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Ferrario-PozziCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Andre Pease, a.k.a., Magic, Beverly Reedy, Latoya PeaseCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Andrew G. ShankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. IsaacsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. CrutcherDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
- United States v. Diaz-RiveraDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2011
- United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011