Legal Opinion
United States v. Ferrario-Pozzi
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 12, 2004No. 03-1393, 03-2306PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Appellant Roberto Ferrario-Pozzi appeals from an order of forfeiture entered against him pursuant to his guilty plea in a money laundering conspiracy. Ferrario-Pozzi contends that the written and oral conditions of his sentence diverged, and thus forfeiture — which he alleges was part of the former but not the latter — was never a part of the final judgment. He ar gues that the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment requires that the oral conditions control. We conclude, however, that forfeiture was a part of Ferrario-Pozzi’s sentence. Due to appellant’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. HurleyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Michael Gilbert, Karen Gilbert, Michael Gilbert Family Irrevocable Trust, Third Party Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Melendez-SantanaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Yeje-CabreraCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- United States v. PonzoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. ChealCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- United States v. ReinerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Ortiz-TorresCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.