United States v. Isaacs

In 1999, Barrington Isaacs was convicted and sentenced for participation in a conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and to distribute cocaine and cocaine base, conspiracy to import cocaine, and conspiracy to engage in money laundering. In December 2002, the district court entered an amended judgment for correction of sentence pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P. 36 to include an omitted reference to an order of forfeiture. Isaacs now seeks to appeal the amended criminal judgment.

Rule 36 provides that “[ajfter giving any notice it considers appropriate, the court may at any time correct a…