Legal Opinion

Pearce v. Twichell

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1867PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to the Circuit Court of Tishamingo county. Hon. W. D. Bradford, judge.

1Opinion of the CourtHarris, J.

Plaintiff in error, Pearce, as the agent of Nedom L. Angen, sued out his writ of replevin for the use of said Pearce, returnable to the March term, 1866, of the Circuit Court of Tishamingo county, which was levied by the sheriff on the corn in dispute, and the said plaintiffs in error executed their replevin bond, and the corn was delivered by the sheriff to the said Pearce. The bond recites that Pearce, instead of Angen, is the plaintiff in replevin, and binds him and the other defendant in error to have the said corn forthcoming, to answer the judgment of the court, &c.

At the March term,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Peck v. IngrahamMississippi Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. MosesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Roof v. Chattanooga Wood Split Pulley Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1895
  3. Thompson v. FoerstelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1881
  4. Meyer v. Mosler ex rel. WarnerMississippi Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. CantrellMississippi Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API