Legal Opinion

United States v. Huntzinger

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided April 30, 2010No. 09-0589/ARPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge EFFRON

delivered the opinion of the Court.

A general court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone, convicted Appellant, contrary to his pleas, of two specifications of violating a lawful general order and one specification of possession of child pornography, in violation of Atieles 92 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 934 (2000). The sentence adjudged by the court-martial and approved by the convening authority included a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for ten months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to the grade…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Shadwick v. City of TampaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. MiddletonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981
  5. United States v. LopezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. HoffmannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
  2. United States v. FoslerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010
  3. United States v. HoffmannNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2014
  4. Huntzinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. United States v. HoffmannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API