Legal Opinion

Koepp v. Peters

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 14, 1961No. 59-C-139PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUBB, District Judge.

Respondent, Century Boat Company (hereafter called “Century”), is moving for an order quashing the monition and dismissing the cause of action as to it on the ground that jurisdiction has not been acquired over it because it has never done business in Wisconsin within the meaning of Section 262.09(4), Wis.Stats. (1957), and is therefore not amenable to service under that section.

The facts in this ease, as derived from the pleadings, affidavits, and other papers on file, disclose that Century is a Michigan corporation engaged in the manufacture and sale of various types…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. National Gas Appliance Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ab Electrolux, a Swedish CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  5. Huck v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McKee v. Brunswick Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  2. Wisconsin Metal & Chemical Corp. v. DeZurik Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1963
  3. Sun-X Glass Tinting of Mid-Wisconsin, Inc. v. Sun-X International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1964
  4. Thill Securities Corporation v. New York Stock ExchangeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968
  5. Metropolitan Sanitary District v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API