W. H. Armstrong & Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Madden, Judge,
delivered the opinion of the.court:
Plaintiff contracted with the defendant to build some thirteen officers’ quarters at Bolling Field in the District of Columbia for $142,046.00. Plaintiff was to furnish all labor and materials to complete the job, except common bricks, which were to he furnished by the defendant. According to the specifications, the basement walls were to be constructed of common bricks, and the walls above the basement were to have a facing of facing bricks backed with common bricks. Before plaintiff submitted its bid, its representatives visited the site and…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Plumley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. R. P. Andrews & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- St. Louis Hay & Grain Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Griffiths v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
- Douglas Aircraft Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1941
3Cited by16 opinions
- Foster Construction C. A. And Williams Brothers Company, a Joint Venture, Etc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Miller Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- The Len Company and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- Williams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.