Legal Opinion
Cryder v. Oxendine
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 29, 1994No. 93-9267PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff James Michael Long appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action challenging the constitutionality of § 34-9-22KT) of the Georgia Workers’ Compensation Act (“Act”), Ga.Code Ann. § 34 — 9—221(i) (Michie 1993). We agree with the district court that the challenged provision of the Act comports with the requirements of due process under the Fourteenth Amendment and therefore affirm.
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On July 15,1991, while employed by defendant NATLSCO, James Michael Long injured his back setting up food displays in a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
3Cited by48 opinions
- Grayden v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Aldana v. Del Monte Fresh Produce, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Reams v. IrvinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Cryder v. OxendineCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Gyadu v. Workers' Compensation CommissionDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.