Legal Opinion

State v. . Hall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1894PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants (Hall as principal, and Dockery as accessory before the fact) were charged with the killing of Andrew Bryson, on 11 July, 1892, in Cherokee County. The testimony tended to show that when the shooting occurred by which deceased was killed, the defendants were in North Carolina and the deceased in Tennessee.

The defendants asked for the following instructions, among others:

1. That it develops upon the State to satisfy the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the killing took place in the State of (911) North Carolina; and if the State has failed to satisfy the jury beyond a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. The AntelopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Commonwealth v. MacloonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. People v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  4. Tyler v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
  5. State v. . CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. ThomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. People v. BettsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. California Development Co. v. New Liverpool Salt Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
  5. Totemoff v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API