Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. United States Mineral Products Co.
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SIMPSON.
Was Monsanto Company’s (Defendant) product, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) defective, that is, unsafe for its intended use? After a five-week re-trial in this Court’s original jurisdiction, a jury impaneled from Northampton County answered this interrogatory in the negative, thereby absolving Defendant from liability for alleged PCB contamination of the former Transportation and Safety Building (Building) in the Capitol Complex in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania.
Plaintiffs1 filed the instant post-trial motions seeking judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) on the issue…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Moure v. RaeuchleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Martin v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- COM., DEPT. OF GENERAL SERVICES v. US Mineral Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Corvin, J. v. Tihansky, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Phelps, N. v. Caperoon, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.