Commonwealth v. Holmes
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
933 A.2d 57 (2007)
COMMONWEALTH
v.
Christopher HOLMES, Appellant.
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant,
v.
Rufus Whitfield, Appellee.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued October 18, 2004.
Resubmitted November 21, 2006.
Decided October 16, 2007.
Ellen T. Greenlee, Karl Baker, Jeffrey Paul Shender, Philadelphia, for Christopher Holmes.
Jason E. Fetterman, Hugh J. Burns, Philadelphia, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Mark Patrick Cichowicz, Karl Baker, Philadelphia, for Rufus Whitfield.
CAPPY, C.J., CASTILLE, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, BALDWIN, FITZGERALD, JJ.
OPINION
Justice BAER.[1]
We granted review in these…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Baldwin; Concurrence · Fitzgerald; Dissent.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. AhlbornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.