Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 2007No. 22, 24 EAP 2004Published

1Opinion of the Court

933 A.2d 57 (2007)

COMMONWEALTH

v.

Christopher HOLMES, Appellant.

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Appellant,

v.

Rufus Whitfield, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued October 18, 2004.

Resubmitted November 21, 2006.

Decided October 16, 2007.

Ellen T. Greenlee, Karl Baker, Jeffrey Paul Shender, Philadelphia, for Christopher Holmes.

Jason E. Fetterman, Hugh J. Burns, Philadelphia, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

Mark Patrick Cichowicz, Karl Baker, Philadelphia, for Rufus Whitfield.

CAPPY, C.J., CASTILLE, SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, BALDWIN, FITZGERALD, JJ.

OPINION

Justice BAER.[1]

We granted review in these…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Baldwin; Concurrence · Fitzgerald; Dissent.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FahySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Commonwealth v. LantzySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. AhlbornSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. HolmesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API