Legal Opinion
Serafin v. William C. Earhart Company Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided January 28, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00192Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION CHRISTOPHER SERAFIN, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:18-cv-00192-YY v. OPINION AND ORDER THE WILLIAM C. EARHART COMPANY, INC., CASCADE GENERAL, INC., LABORER’S LOCAL UNION 296, OREGON LABORERS’-EMPLOYERS PENSION PLAN TRUST, Defendants. YOU, Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Christopher Serafin (“Serafin”) has brought an action against defendants—The William C. Earhart Company, Inc. (“Earhart”), Cascade General, Inc. (“Cascade General”), Laborers Local 737 (“Local 737”), as successor in interest to Laborers Local 296 (“Local 296”), and Oregon…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Lee v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.