Legal Opinion

Hunter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 1929No. A-6544PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChappell, J.

The plaintiffs in error, hereinafter called defendants, were convicted in the county court of Canadian county on a charge of having possession of mash and were each fined $50, and each sentenced to serve 30' days in the county jail.

This is a companion case to No. A-6545, 43 Okla. Cr. 138, 277 Pac. 952, decided at this sitting of the court, and the conviction rests upon substantially the same evidence as the conviction in that case. The defendants filed their conviction in A-6545 as a bar to a prosecution in this case. Under the search warrant issued in these cases the officers found a still…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estep v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Hourigan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hayes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Kirkpatrick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API