Legal Opinion
Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided February 11, 2014No. Case No. 3:12-cv-02023-HAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
HAGGERTY, District Judge:
Plaintiff, the Oregon Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) brought this action for declaratory relief against the United States Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 to determine its rights and obligations in complying with administrative subpoenas issued by the DEA. The American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Inc., John Does 1-4, and Dr. James Roe, M.D. (collectively “ACLU” or “intervenors”), intervened in this matter pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a) over the objections of the DEA in order to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Whalen v. RoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pyle v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Lewis v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2017
- United States v. Myron MotleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Lewis v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2014