Legal Opinion
Battineni v. Jaddou
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 21, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2024-0302Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA RAKESH BATTINENI, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 24-cv-302 (CRC) UR JADDOU, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Tired of waiting for immigration officials to renew his authorization to return to the United States after traveling abroad, Tennessee resident and Green Card applicant Rakesh Battineni brings a novel argument to facilitate the international trips he wishes to make. He claims that Section 558(c) of the Administrative Procedure Act, which governs licenses, automatically extended his expired travel authorization. And he asks the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Trump v. HawaiiSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.