Legal Opinion
Ramat v. Nielsen
District Court, S.D. California
Decided July 6, 2018No. Case No.: 3:17-cv-02474-BEN-JLBPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
Hon. Roger T. Benitez, United States District Judge *1113Pending before the Court are Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction,1 Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, Plaintiff's ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order, and Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a supplemental memorandum in support of his opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss. (Docket Nos. 6, 8, 13, 15.) Because the Court finds it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Nevada v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Donald L. Snell v. Cleveland, Inc., and Patricia Faber John Does Jane DoesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Roberto Mauricio-Benitez v. Jefferson Sessions, IICourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Zapata-CortinasDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2018
- United States v. Romero-CaceresDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- United States v. LopezDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- United States v. TzulDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.