Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Lawrence Davis

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 8, 2005No. 04-2589PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Circuit Judge.

After Richard Lawrence Davis was convicted by a jury of possessing more than 50 grams of crack cocaine with the intent to distribute, his motion for a new trial was granted and the government appealed. We reversed, reinstating the conviction and remanding for sentencing. See United States v. Davis, 367 F.3d 787, 790 (8th Cir.2004). On remand the district court1 imposed a 20 year mandatory minimum sentence. Davis appeals, arguing that he is entitled to a new trial because of the prosecutor’s improper closing argument, that he did not have a qualifying prior felony…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. Adam David HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Guzman-TlasecaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. Adrian DunnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. BallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2005
  5. United States v. CraddockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API