Legal Opinion
United States v. Craddock
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 1, 2010No. 09-1789PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Per curiam
In October 2008, Michael Craddock pled guilty to possession with intent to distribute over 50 grams of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A). Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 851, the government sought to enhance Craddock’s sentence based upon a prior conviction for sale of a controlled substance that resulted in a suspended imposition of sentence.
The district court 2 accepted this enhancement and sentenced Craddock to 240 months imprisonment, the mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to § 841(b)(1)(A). Craddock appeals this sentence, and we affirm.
I
Following Craddock’s…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. Raymon Ortega, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Howard Quinton CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Charles FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. BetcherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. DurhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Mike CoffeltCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Sisney v. ReischCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Jose Jaime LopezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.