Kiddell v. Bristow
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Krugh, J., Darlington, December, 1903. Foreclosure by Charles Kiddell, executor, and Martha A. Ryan and Caroline Ryan Nash, executrixes of W. K. Ryan, against Cherry Bristow and other heirs at law of Belford Bristow and Nelson Scott.
Read the full summary
Before Krugh, J., Darlington, December, 1903. Foreclosure by Charles Kiddell, executor, and Martha A. Ryan and Caroline Ryan Nash, executrixes of W. K. Ryan, against Cherry Bristow and other heirs at law of Belford Bristow and Nelson Scott. From Circuit decree, defendants, Cherry Bristow, Peter Bristow, Isaac Bristow, Joseph Bristow, Louisa Jackson and Maria Dukes, appeal. cites: As to objection to jurisdiction: 11 S. C., 409; 13 S. C., 130; 60 S. C., 380; 61 S. C., 569. Objection to exhibit not too late: 60 S. C., 379; 62 S. C., 244; 1 Green on Ev., sec. 572. Mr. Dargan cites: As to…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Jones.
The object of this action was to foreclose a deed of real estate declared to be a mortgage, in the case of Bristow v. Rosenburg, 45 S. C., 614, 23 S. E., 957. The Circuit Court confirming the report of the master, and overruling all exceptions thereto, gave decree of foreclosure in the sum of $3,068.51, from which certain of the defendants, represented now by S. S. Davis, Esq., appeal.
1 1. The first exception assigns that the Court committed error in compelling the defendants’ counsel to come to trial on the 6th day of December, 1902.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pickett v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
- Bristow v. RosenbergSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kirton v. HowardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Duncan v. DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- Watkins v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
- Rice v. Brandon CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Setzer v. FoilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936