Bristow v. Rosenberg
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Fraser, J., Darlington, December, 1893. Action by Cherry Bristow and other heirs at law of Belford Bristow against Joseph Rosenberg and Philip Kalmus, to compel a reconveyance of a tract of land, for an accounting, and to enjoin an action in ejectment by the defendant, Rosenberg. Judgment for defendants. Plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
This action was originally commenced by Belford Bristow, but after the commencement of the action he died, and it was continued in the names of his heirs at law, who were substituted in his stead as parties plaintiff. In 1878, Belford Bristow, a negro, commenced to get his supplies from the defendant, Philip Kalmus, a merchant, then engaged in business at Darling-*615ton. Nelson Scott, a son-in-law of Belford Bristow, was living with him at that time, and also commenced to trade with Philip Kalmus. Belford Bristow owned a tract of land,…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Kiddell v. BristowSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1903