Legal Opinion

In Re Urias

California Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1966No. L. A. 28833PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Petitioner, a member of the State Bar admitted to practice in 1950, was convicted in November 1964 on four counts of grand theft. Motions for new trial and probation were denied, and he was given consecutive sentences of one year in the county jail on each count. He did not appeal.

We suspended petitioner from the practice of law and referred the matter to the State Bar for hearing, report and recommendation as to the nature and extent of the discipline to be imposed. (Bus. & Prof. Code, §§ 6101, 6102.) A local administrative committee conducted hearings and recommended that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zitny v. State Bar of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Sturr v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In Re FreiburghouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. In Re LangfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Yokozeki v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re BogartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Doyle v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. In Re CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. In Re WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API