Legal Opinion

In Re Freiburghouse

California Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1959No. L. A. 25369PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Wayne M. Freiburghouse, an attorney admitted to practice law in this state, was charged with four counts of grand theft and three counts of forgery of endorsements in connected transactions. He pleaded guilty to two counts of grand theft involving sums aggregating $20,000, and the other counts, which involved the taking of an additional $16,000, were dismissed. Probation was denied, and he was sentenced to prison for the term prescribed by law.

Upon the filing of the record of conviction under sections 6101-6102 of the State Bar Act, Freiburghouse was suspended from practice and…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bradpiece v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Himmel v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Frazer v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Simmons v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Hyland v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API