Legal Opinion
Maw v. Kitzman
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Moellring, Dist. J.
This is an appeal by the. defendailt from an order vacating and setting aside an award made under arbitration proceedings. The agreement to arbitrate is in writing, and was entered into by the parties on the 9th day of March, 1926. That part of the arbitration agreement, material for our consideration, is in the following language:
“This agreement, made and entered into by and between William F. Kitzman, hereinafter called the party of the first part, and Paul Maw, hereinafter called the party of the second part, both of the city of Willow City, in the county of Bottineau,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cummington Realty Associates v. WhittenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Frederick v. MargwarthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Hackney v. AdamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Hartford Fire Ins. v. Bonner Mercantile Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1890
- Blackledge v. Simpson.Superior Court of North Carolina · 1798
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Junta de Relaciones del Trabajo v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949
- Local 63, Textile Workers Union of America v. Cheney Bros.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Davidson v. S. S. Jacobs Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1957
- Local 63, Textile Workers Union of America v. Cheney Bros.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Puerto Rico Labor Relations Board v. New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1949