Legal Opinion

Gray v. Amoco Production Company

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 20, 1977No. 48,385PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rees, J.:

This action is another round in litigation involving oil and gas royalty owners and producers in the Hugoton-Anadarko area. Plaintiff royalty owners seek interest on royalties held in “suspense” by their producer after it sold gas but before the sale prices were finally determined by the Federal Power Commission. The trial court awarded interest. Defendant producer has appealed from the award. Plaintiffs have appealed from the amount of the award arguing it was insufficient.

The Hugoton-Anadarko area is a rate-making area within the jurisdiction of the Federal Power Commission…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Lightcap v. Mobil Oil CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stahl Petroleum Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  3. Cotracom Commodity Trading Co. v. Seaboard Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  4. Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  5. Dragon v. Vanguard Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API