Legal Opinion

Fox v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 17, 2018No. 17AP-745PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSadler, J.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, JamiLynn Fox, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas in favor of defendants-appellees, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company ("Nationwide") and Shymal Sogal. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

{¶ 2} Immediately prior to the events that give rise to this case, Fox owned and operated two Allstate Insurance ("Allstate") offices in New York City. According to Fox, she owned the book of business that she had acquired at Allstate, which meant that she retained servicing rights on the policies she sold and…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Kelly v. Medical Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bostic v. ConnorOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Forbes v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Block Communications, Inc. v. Moorgate Capital Partners, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
  3. Knapke v. PeopleConnect IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2021
  4. Shabazz v. ICWUC Center for Worker Health & Safety EducationDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
  5. Sharqawi v. Kirby CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API