Legal Opinion

Amerine v. Haughton Elevator Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1989No. 87-2123PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The issue presented is whether Civ. R. 15(D), read in conjunction with Civ. R. 15(C) and 3(A), allows appellants’ amended complaint of May 14, 1984 to relate back to the time of the filing of the original complaint on August 22, 1983.

Civ. R. 15(D) states:

“Amendments where name of party unknown. When the plaintiff does not know the name of a defendant, that defendant may be designated in a pleading or proceeding by any name and description. When the name is discovered, the pleading or proceeding must be amended accordingly. The plaintiff, in such case, must aver in the complaint the fact that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Varno v. Bally Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Erwin v. BryanOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. LaNeve v. Atlas Recycling, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Ludwigsen v. Lakeside Plaza, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. Cecil v. CottrillOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Pearson v. ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 2014

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API