Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ott

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1944No. Appeals, 54 and 55PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Appellant and one Ralph Tenaglio were jointly indicted and tried on two bills of indictment charging conspiracy to commit larceny, larceny, and receiving stolen goods.. At the close of .the Commonwealth’s case, appellant entered demurrers to the evidence on both bills. The demurrers were overruled and exceptions noted. At the same time, appellant, who offered no evidence in his own behalf, made a verbal request for binding instructions, which was denied with no exception taken. Tenaglio testified in his own defense, and at the close of his testimony, appellant again pressed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StrantzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Commonwealth v. LibonatiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Commonwealth v. MarinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Commonwealth v. ErnestoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Commonwealth v. HellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EVANSSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Commonwealth v. EllsworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Commonwealth v. WheelerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Commonwealth v. GomoriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Commonwealth v. RicciSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API