Legal Opinion
Ohio Tax Cases
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 9, 1914No. Nos. 642 and 643PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
232 U.S. 576 (1914)
OHIO TAX CASES.
OHIO RIVER AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY
v.
DITTEY ET AL., AS THE TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO.
MARIETTA, COLUMBUS AND CLEVELAND RAILROAD COMPANY
v.
CREAMER ET AL., AS THE TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO.
Nos. 642, 643.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 7, 1914.
Decided February 24, 1914.
APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO.
Mr. Robert J. King and Mr F.A. Durban for appellants.
Mr. Frank Davis, Jr., and Mr. Clarence D. Laylin, with whom Mr. Timothy S. Hogan, Attorney General of the State of Ohio, was on the brief, for…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Willcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Bowman v. Continental Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.