Legal Opinion
D. M. C. Construction Corp. v. A. Leo Nash Steel Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 22, 1976PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding to compel arbitration, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 8, 1975, which granted the petitioner’s motion to change the venue of the arbitration proceeding from Buffalo to New York City. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. We find ample ground for Special Term’s appropriate exercise of its discretion to have the arbitration proceeding conducted in the city in which the records are located and to avoid unnecessary hardship and needless expense to parties, witnesses, etc. Martuscello, Latham and Margett, JJ., concur;…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Nationwide General Insurance v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- In re the Arbitration between Bradford Woolen Corp. & FreedmanNew York Supreme Court · 1947
- D. M. C. Construction Corp. v. A. Leo Nash Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
3Cited by8 opinions
- D. M. C. Construction Corp. v. A. Leo Nash Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Santana v. Country-Wide InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1998
- State Farm Insurance v. McManusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Santana v. Country-Wide InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2000
- Stevens v. Coudert Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.