Legal Opinion

Santana v. Country-Wide Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 1, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order unanimously affirmed with $10 costs.

*295The petitioner operated an automobile and allegedly sustained personal injuries in an accident while uninsured motorist coverage from respondent was in effect (see, Insurance Law § 3420 [f] [1]). Petitioner served a demand for arbitration under the uninsured motorist coverage.

On the day of the hearing, respondent’s counsel, claiming a conflict of interest, requested that the arbitrator recuse himself. Upon the arbitrator’s refusal, the attorney left the proceeding without participating. The arbitrator subsequently…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. D. M. C. Construction Corp. v. A. Leo Nash Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. ENS Med., P.C. v. Nationwide Ins. Co.New York Supreme Court, Kings County · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API