Legal Opinion

D. M. C. Construction Corp. v. A. Leo Nash Steel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In a proceeding to stay arbitration of a contract dispute, in which respondent cross-moved to compel arbitration, petitioner appeals from portions of two orders of the Supreme Court, Kings County, both dated June 16, 1975, as follows: (1) from so much of the first order as (a) dismissed the petition and (b) granted the cross motion and (2) from so much of the second order as, upon reargument, adhered to the original decision. Appeal from the original order dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order which granted reargument. Order on reargument affirmed insofar as appealed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. May v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  2. A. Burgart, Inc. v. Foster-Lipkins Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1970
  3. A. Burgart, Inc. v. Foster-Lipkins Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. D. M. C. Construction Corp. v. A. Leo Nash Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. D. M. C. Construction Corp. v. A. Leo Nash Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  3. Tradesource, Inc. v. Ancor, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API