Legal Opinion

Hodges v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 7, 1953No. 365-52PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Whitaker, Jwdg/3,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This case is before us on defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s petition. That motion disregards the naming of the United States Army as the defendant, instead of the United States, and is grounded on, first, the bar of the statute of limitations, and, second, the lack of authority to bind the United States of those alleged to have requisitioned plaintiff’s property.

Plaintiff alleges in his petition that a lieutenant of the Panay guerrillas, one Abelardo Muyco, alleged to be the commanding officer of the guerrillas in the Passi Sector,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. CressSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Sterling v. ConstantinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. United States v. LynahSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  5. United States v. North American Transportation & Trading Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Homcy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  2. Thoen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  3. Anno v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
  4. Caltex (Philippines), Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API