Legal Opinion
Wallrich v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided September 12, 2023No. 1:22-cv-05506Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PAULA WALLRICH, DANIELLE JONES, GRANT GRINNELL, JEFFREY BURTON, RHONDA MCCALLUM, PROVIDENCIA VILLEGAS, and 49,980 other individuals, Petitioners, Case No. 22 C 5506 v. Judge Harry D. Leinenweber SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Respondents. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Petitioners, each Samsung device users, petitioned this Court to compel arbitration against Respondent Samsung (Dkt. No. 1; Dkt. No. 2) upon Samsung’s refusal to pay filing fees. Samsung moved to…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.