United States v. T. E. Hill, Jr. And Larry Moore, T. E. Hill, Jr. And Larry Moore v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Circuit Judge.
By judgment on a jury verdict, T. E. Hill, Jr. and Larry Moore, of Wichita Falls, Texas, officers and stockholders-of Hill and Moore, Inc., were held individually liable for penalties prescribed by Section 6672 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. 1 There were jury verdicts-against the bank, bonding company, and certain of their officers, with which the defaulting corporation did business. The District Court entered judgment non obstante in favor of the latter defendants. Hill and Moore appeal from the judgment against them; the Government appeals the action in favor…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Edward J. Bloom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- United States v. L. P. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- United States v. Joseph X. StreblerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Hal C. Frazier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
- James R. Cash v. Ellis Campbell, Jr., District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Roland J. Kalb v. United States of America, and Third-Party v.jerome L. Herold, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- J. A. Newsome, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Richard D. Barnett v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- Harold E. Harrington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.