Legal Opinion

Hal C. Frazier v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1962No. 19426_1PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed against Frazier a penalty in the amount of $450.85 under Section 6672 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. 1 Frazier paid the penalty and filed a claim for refund which was denied. He then filed suit for refund as permitted by 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(a) (1). Upon trial, the district court directed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant. This appeal is from the judgment entered upon that verdict. The sole insistence on error is that the court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant because it was open to the jury to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Edward J. Bloom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  2. Felton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Kellems v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1951
  4. The Gray Line Company, a Corporation v. R. C. Granquist, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Cushman v. WoodDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  2. Mazo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. J. A. Newsome, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. Harold E. Harrington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
  5. Robert White v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API