Hal C. Frazier v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RIVES, Circuit Judge.
The Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed against Frazier a penalty in the amount of $450.85 under Section 6672 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. 1 Frazier paid the penalty and filed a claim for refund which was denied. He then filed suit for refund as permitted by 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(a) (1). Upon trial, the district court directed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant. This appeal is from the judgment entered upon that verdict. The sole insistence on error is that the court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant because it was open to the jury to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Edward J. Bloom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Felton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Kellems v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1951
- The Gray Line Company, a Corporation v. R. C. Granquist, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Cushman v. WoodDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Mazo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- J. A. Newsome, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Harold E. Harrington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- Robert White v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.