Legal Opinion
Rudgayzer & Gratt v. Enine, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided April 14, 2004PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
On the court’s own motion, the appeals are consolidated for purposes of disposition.
Order entered October 1, 2002 unanimously reversed without costs, plaintiffs motion for summary judgment granted on the issue of liability only and matter remanded to the court below for an assessment of damages (action No. 1).
Order entered November 8, 2002 unanimously reversed without costs, defendant’s motion for summary judgment denied and, upon a search of the record, summary judgment granted to plaintiff on the issue of liability only and matter remanded to the court below…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Trustees of State Univ. of NY v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Weber v. U.S. Sterling Securities, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Centerline Equipment Corp. v. Banner Personnel Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Stern v. BluestoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Neurocare Institute of Central Florida, P.A. v. Healthtap, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2014
- Gottlieb v. Carnival Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.