Legal Opinion

Layman v. Woo

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1997No. 1996-0390PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 78 Ohio St.3d 485.] LAYMAN ET AL.; OHIO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, APPELLEE, v. WOO ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Cite as Layman v. Woo,

1997-Ohio-195.] Medical malpractice—Statutory construction—R.C. 5101.58 is an exception to former R.C. 2305.27. (No. 96-390—Submitted March 19, 1997—Decided May 28, 1997.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Ashtabula County, No. 95-A-0036. __________________ {¶ 1} On November 29, 1993, plaintiff Natalie Layman, the mother and guardian of Matthew Layman, filed a medical malpractice complaint in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chemtrol Adhesives, Inc. v. American Manufacturers Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Carter v. Division of WaterOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State ex rel. Gareau v. StillmanOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Hodge v. Middletown Hospital Ass'nOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Layman v. WooOhio Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lawson v. Dutch Heritage Farms, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2007
  2. Miller v. CantonOhio Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API