Legal Opinion
Austraw v. Dietz
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided November 9, 1945No. [No. 15, October Term, 1945.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDelaplaine, J.
William H. Austraw and his wife allege in their bill of complaint: (1) That on November 2, 1929, they acquired title to certain real estate at Twin River Beach by a second mortgage from Mary Gliesman and her husband to secure the sum of $1,900; (2) that on November 19, 1930, John F. Oyeman, attorney named in the mortgage for purpose of foreclosure, instituted foreclosure proceedings, and he sold the mortgaged property subject to the first mortgage; (3) that on March 2,1936, after the auditor’s report showed that the proceeds of sale were not sufficient to pay the mortgage debt, Oyeman filed a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Noonan v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
- Hanover Fire Insurance v. Alexander Brown & SonsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Dunkley v. Van BurenNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
- Frank v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cook v. BoehlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
- Cook v. HollydayCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- Wellington Co. v. ShakibaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Brown v. FraleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Pulliam v. Dyck-O'Neal, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.