Harringer v. Keenan
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Pemberton, J., entered November 17, 1920, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for alienation of affections, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
In this action the respondent, Harringer, sued the appellant, Keenan, for alienation of his wife’s affections. The cause was tried by the court, •sitting without a jury, and resulted in a judgment in favor of the respondent for the sum of six hundred dollars.
The first error assigned on the appeal is that the court erred in reinstating the cause after it had been dismissed for the failure of the respondent to file a nonresident cost bond. It appears that the appellant, on his appearance in cause, moved for a cost bond, and that the court ordered such a bond to be furnished on or before a date…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chehalis Coal Co. v. LaisureWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Beach v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Stanley v. StanleyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Brandt v. LittleWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Hoefer v. SawtelleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Raborn v. HaytonWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Tradewell Stores, Inc. v. T. B. & M., Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Johnson v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
- Capen v. WesterWashington Supreme Court · 1961
- Graham v. Yakima Stock Brokers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.