Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 19, 1961No. 39048PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Hall, Judge.

The first question that must be answered is whether the sustaining of the general demurrers to the original petition is the law of the case controlling the renewed general demurrers to the amended petition. “The question for decision is whether the amendment met the criticisms of the demurrer as provided by the judgment.” Childs v. Blaine, 84 Ga. App. 847, 850 (67 SE2d 787). The defendant contends that the amendment to the petition did not by any proper allegations of fact, add any new elements to make a cause of action. Eliminating from consideration the conclusions alleged in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mendel v. Converse & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Carusos v. Briarcliff Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
  3. Southern Railway Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  4. Washington Water & Electric Co. v. Pope Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  5. Childs v. BlaineCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mull v. Emory University, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API