Legal Opinion

Mull v. Emory University, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1966No. 41663PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Judge.

1. While the brief of appellant makes no specific reference to the general demurrer (demurrer No. 1) which was renewed or to the other renewed demurrers (Nos. 16, 17, 23, and 27), the law and argument presented in the brief of the appellant on the other demurrers specifically referred to, which argument contains references to the allegations in the paragraphs demurred to by the above demurrers, is so entwined and enmeshed with the principles and reasoning applicable to the general demurrer and the renewed demurrers that we cannot say that the appellant has abandoned his…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Akridge v. NobleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Fincher v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  3. Peoples Loan Company v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  4. Norton v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Peoples Loan Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Felix v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
  2. Kenney v. Piedmont HospitalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Mallett v. PirkeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  4. Holt v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  5. Young v. YarnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API