Legal Opinion

Stephenson v. Binford

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided October 26, 1931No. 479PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Faced with the grave necessity of adequately regulating motor traffic on the highways of Texas in the interest at once of the safety of the traveling public, the protection of the highways, and the maintenance of a safe and dependable transportation system, both by rail and by road for the people of the state, the Forty-Second Legislature of Texas at its regular session enacted into law a legislative program designed and comprehensive enough to deal with and to remedy the mischiefs incident to unregulated use of the highways, including those arising from the *511unpreceden…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Tyson & Brother v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission of Texas v. ShupeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Del Rio Ex Rel. Del Rio v. CrakeHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Inter-City Forwarding Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1931
  5. State Ex Rel. Toedebusch Transfer, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API