Legal Opinion

State v. Harrison

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 26, 1988No. 2 CA-CR 87-0495PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

This case involves the question of the reliability of the second sample provided to the defendants in two DUI cases which were consolidated for purposes of an evi-dentiary hearing.

Appellees George Harrison and Halbert F. Laiwakete were each charged with two counts of driving under the influence while their operator’s licenses were suspended, cancelled, revoked or refused, both class 5 felonies. The first count, filed pursuant to A.R.S. § 28-692(A), was for driving under the influence, and the second, filed pursuant to A.R.S. § 28-692(B), was for driving with a 0.10…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Baca v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State Ex Rel. Collins v. SeidelArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Scales v. City Court of City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. VelascoArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. MacK v. CruikshankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  3. State Ex Rel. Dean v. City CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. VannoyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  5. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API