Legal Opinion

Manning v. Sams

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 20, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Patterson. Cobb superior court. September 3, 1913. (

1Per curiam

1. Error was assigned upon a judgment overruling the plaintiffs’ demurrer to certain portions of the defendant’s answer. This assignment of error was not argued or referred to in the brief of counsel for plaintiffs in error, and, under repeated rulings of this court, will be treated as abandoned.

2. In an equitable action by the purchaser against the seller for specific performance of a contract for the sale of land, the petition declared upon the following contract: “Subject to approval of titles, W. A. Sams agrees to sell to II. S. and T. L. Manning, and they agree to buy from him [then…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Middleton v. FindlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Northington-Munger-Pratt Co. v. Farmers Gin & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  3. Adams v. BridgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnston v. LanducciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Washington Water & Electric Co. v. Pope Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Douglas v. LangfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  4. R. C. Cropper Co. v. Middle Georgia Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  5. Carr v. RawlingsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API