State v. Bohn
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GORDON, Justice:
Appellant was convicted of possession of heroin in violation of A.R.S. § 36-1002. On appeal, three issues were raised, the primary being whether due process of law requires disclosure of the identity of a confidential informant. We take jurisdiction pursuant to 17A A.R.S.Sup.Ct. Rules, rule 47(e).
On November 6, 1974 a search warrant was issued for a motel room in Phoenix, Arizona. 1 The police officer who sought the warrant based the statements in his affidavit on information received from an informant which indicated that three men, whose descriptions were given, were at the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. TinghitellaArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. KingArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. GoldsmithArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. AltamiranoArizona Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by49 opinions
- State v. DannArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. HudsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- State v. Garcia-ContrerasArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. FristoeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- State v. SunigaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.