Legal Opinion

State v. Fristoe

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 26, 1982No. 1 CA-CR 5517PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

Appellant Edgar Fristoe was indicted on three counts of attempting to engage in oral sexual contact with minors under the age of fifteen years, class three felonies, and one count of attempting to engage in oral sexual contact with a minor fifteen years of age or older, a class one misdemeanor. A.R.S. §§ 13-1001, 13-1405. Appellant did not appear at time of trial and was tried before a jury in absentia. The jury found appellant guilty on all four charges. After appellant was apprehended in Kansas and returned to Arizona on the bench warrant issued for his failure to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. HarvillArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. MandelArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  4. State v. ChildsArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Gervin v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hersick v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. BartlettArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. United States v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Young v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Ishee v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API