Legal Opinion

State v. Hudson

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 30, 1990PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

STEIN, J.

The question in this appeal is whether the convictions of two defendants who knew the date, time, and place of their joint trial should be vacated because they left the courtroom before trial commenced. At issue is the application of Rule 3:16, which provides in relevant part:

The defendant shall be present at every stage of the trial including the impaneling of the jury and the return of the verdict, and at the imposition of sentence, unless otherwise provided by rule, but the defendant’s voluntary absence after trial has commenced in his…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Brookhart v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. MortonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. State v. A.R.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. SullensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. State v. FisherSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  5. State v. ReeveyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API