Legal Opinion

Northeastern Educational Television of Ohio, Inc. v. Educational Television Assoc. of Metropolitan Cleveland

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 28, 1990No. C87-1666PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WILLIAM K. THOMAS, Senior District Judge.

I

This action alleges violations of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. Sections 1 and 2), and was originally brought pursuant to Sections 1, 4, 5,12 and 16 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. Sections 12, 15, 16, 22 and 26). As noted in this court’s November 26, 1990 Order, 758 F.Supp. 1560, this action is currently “proceeding only with its prayer for injunctive relief under 15 U.S.C. § 26.” Id. at 1561.

The plaintiff is Northeastern Educational Television of Ohio, Inc. (hereinafter “NETO”) which operates as WNEO-TV (Channel…

2Cases cited31 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

Futurevision Cable Systems of Wiggins, Inc. v. Multivision Cable TV Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1992
Storer Cable Communications, Inc. v. City of MontgomeryDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1993