Legal Opinion

Thomas More High School v. Burmaster

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 9, 2005No. 2004AP2511PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurley, J.

¶ 1. Thomas More High School (More) appeals from the trial court order affirming the decision of Elizabeth Burmaster, the State Superintendent of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (DPI), who determined that More is not eligible to *224participate in the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program (Choice), pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 119.23 (2003-04),1 because the school is not located in the City of Milwaukee. On appeal, More contends that, under the plain language of § 119.23(2)(a), it is located in the City of Milwaukee, and that Wis. Admin. Code § PI 35.03 does not apply to More because it is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hutson v. State Personnel CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Peterson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. ITW Deltar v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peggy Z. Coyne v. Scott WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Peggy Z. Coyne v. Scott WalkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Thomas More High School v. BurmasterCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API