Legal Opinion

Lahens v. AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc.

District Court, D. Puerto Rico

Decided September 8, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01776Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO FÉLIX LAHENS, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL NO.: 18-1776 (MEL) AT&T MOBILITY PUERTO RICO, INC., et al. Defendant. AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER Mr. Félix Lahens (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc. (“Defendant or AT&T Mobility”) and AT&T, Inc. on October 16, 2018.1 ECF No. 1. In his complaint, Plaintiff alleges that he was discriminated against because of his age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”),

29 U.S.C. §§ 621

et. seq., and Title 29, Annotated Laws of Puerto Rico, Section…

2Cases cited75 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API